tag 标签: cabinet

相关博文
  • 热度 22
    2015-3-27 14:07
    1392 次阅读|
    0 个评论
    It's strange how things sometimes seem to come at you in waves. For example, I've recently been inundated with messages from friends pointing me at incredible mechanisms that make me squeal "Ooh, Shiny!" in a high-pitched voice (I'm not proud of doing it; I'm working on self-control).   Let's start with my chum Joe in the UK. He sent me this link saying: "Here’s one that will have you drooling..." He was right!     Next, we have this video of the most amazing Fletcher Capstan Table. All I can say is that this is a thing of beauty and a joy to behold. I would love to build something like this, but I fear it is far beyond my capabilities.     Well, I was still drooling over the table when my chum Jay pointed me toward this video of a mind-boggling James Bond-esque cabinet (if James had lived in the 16th century). The real magic is how hidden weights are used to power the various mechanisms. Once again, I would love to create something that had a fraction of this beauty's capabilities.     Last but not least, for the moment, we have another offering from Jay -- this video of the most incredible model engine. The engine starts off running slowly -- then speeds up -- then speeds up again. As you will see, this little scamp boasts incredibly high precision; I only wish my truck engine was half as balanced.     So, what do you think? You have to admit that these are all rather tasty. Which impressed you the most? And which would you most like to own if you got the chance?
  • 热度 27
    2014-9-5 15:51
    1707 次阅读|
    1 个评论
    Creators of hobby projects and the creators of professional prototypes alike share a common dilemma -- what to do about the cabinet. In the not-so-distant past, creating a prototype printed circuit board (PCB) was the most time-consuming and expensive problem, but now this is much less of an issue. By comparison, acquiring an affordable, professional-looking cabinet remains an expensive undertaking.   Recently, I've been chatting to someone who thinks he has a solution -- Charles Spence. In a recent telephone conversation, Charles was saying that he is thinking of launching a Kickstarter project, but first he would like to "hoist his idea up the flagpole and see how well it flies," as it were, and that's where you come into the picture. I personally really like Charles's idea, so I asked him to write it up in more detail so I could share it with you. Charles responded as follows:   Dear Max, thank you for giving me the opportunity to share my idea with others. One part of building prototype electronics that continues to plague me is the cabinet. It still seems to be the remaining piece for the hobbyist and professional that forces their work to look amateurish to family and friends or to the customer. While I admire the quick and dirty methods Jim Williams and Bob Pease taught us, only the enlightened few seemed to deeply appreciate the ingenuity of a cookie tin for EMI shielding. However, it takes an understanding wife or boss to accommodate the hoarding of these likely Christmas gifts.   While I am also a fan of the "dead bug" method of circuit prototyping, it tends to hide significant issues with regard to parasitic capacitance or leakage paths that -- if you ever want to replicate your circuit -- will bite you. I also argue that creating a decent cabinet is more time-consuming than creating a prototype PCB. This is because you can go straight to a PCB for little relative cost these days (when I started my first real electronics job, it was $1K for a set of two-layer proto-PCBs; now it's only around $120 on the high end). I create a PCB for all my prototypes -- what seems to remain is the box.   On my last project, I think I came up with a solution I would like to share with your readers. This solution applies principles similar to those that enable low-cost prototype PCBs and even low-cost integrated circuits -- share the panel or wafer.   Current industrial CNC laser cutters can slice up a panel of aluminum quickly and cheaply. What seems to plague the sheet metal business is making a bend cheaply enough for use in prototype cabinets. A simple aluminum extrusion gets past this issue, which inspired the following cabinet design.       This example represents a 3" x 5" x 7" deep cabinet. The panels are intended to be cut from 0.050" thick 5052-H32 sheet aluminum. For the purposes of this example, the extrusions are shown in orange in an effort to make their design more visible. These extrusions are intended to be made from 6061 aluminum hardened to T5 or T6. The extrusions do include a guide channel for a PCB, but the PCB(s) could also be mounted to any panel via standoffs and screws.   In one implementation, the bottom and two side panels could be glued to the extrusions with a cyanoacrylate (Krazy Glue I) like Loctite 380 (Black Max) or an adhesive transfer tape like 3M 465 or 966. The top panel would still be allowed to slide to facilitate easier access to the internal electronics for debugging and testing.   The cheapest way to make this type of cabinet uses raw aluminum. My current estimates show they could be made with custom cutouts for $50 each in quantities of one, assuming several people ordered cabinets at the same time (each cabinet can be different). Furthermore, since the un-assembled cabinet can be shipped flat, it can be sent via USPS Priority Mail bubble pack to most places in the US for less than $6.00.   Observe that this basic design can be extended all the way up to 19" rack-mount cabinets. The front panel can be extended to have rack mounting holes (but it would also need to be made from thicker aluminum, which would drive the price up a bit). A simple bracket could be mounted in the middle to stiffen the center section for cabinets this wide. Below we see two different views of a real-world cabinet created using this concept. Since the die for the extrusion would cost more than I care to spend at the moment, I decided to see what I could do with off-the-shelf 3/4" x 3/4" x 1/8" right-angle aluminum extrusions. The cabinet pictured is 10" x 10" and 3" deep. (The power supply is a little overkill to minimize conductive noise issues for a sensor and the horrid ground loop. This is a prototype. I don't like spending inordinate amounts of time chasing noise issues, ground loops, and my stupidity.)       In the case of this example, everything is screwed together, which involves way too much work drilling and tapping. Of course, you can still do this with my proposed custom extrusions, but I tend to think glue looks like a better alternative. Having said this, I do struggle with things that cannot be easily undone (cyanoacrylate does come off with acetone, but unpredictably).   The way this works The way I envisage this working is that I would have a die created to fabricate my special extrusions. When other people want custom cabinets made, they would send me the CNC files associated with the sub-panels for their cabinets (more about this below). I would take the sub-panel designs from multiple people and combine them into one big panel file to send to the folks with the industrial CNC laser cutter. By combining multiple sub-panels into one big panel in this way, the cost of laser-cutting the sub-panels will be reduced dramatically. Finally, I would ship the sub-panels along with four appropriately sized extrusions to each of the people who had ordered a cabinet.   What needs to be done A die needs to be made for the extrusion. A website needs to be established for taking orders. And, most important, the customers need to be willing and able to supply drawings of the panels with the cutouts they want in DXF format files.   I'm thinking that the website could provide templates in DXF format for front and back panels that show the corner details. In this case, there could be a range of panels for standard-size boxes from smallest to largest. Cutouts for common connectors like DB-9 and DB-25, USB, and Ethernet could also be provided in DXF format. However, the biggest problem for making these cabinets is modeling the printed circuit board where these connectors are placed accurately so that the holes in the cabinet will line up. I do not see an easy solution that is also low-cost to the end user. We have the same issue with PCBs. Until Cadsoft's Eagle came along, there really was no good low-cost PCB tool available.   AutoCAD and SolidWorks have powerful features that make doing this easy, but also have a steep learning curve to get to the point of it being "easy." They are also expensive if you are not going to school. DesignSpark Mechanical looks like a possible alternative, but I have not used it myself. SketchUp ends up have a learning curve to make it useable, as do other open-source alternatives.   In the end, the CNC laser house needs DXF files that have all the sides panelized to enable a service like this to be at the cost level now available for prototype two- and four-layer PCBs.   Cost comparison A 12" x 7" x 4" LMB or Hammond U-shaped 1411 type Al box from DigiKey costs $27.30 plus shipping. Circuit Specialists offers a better-looking enclosure 11.9" x 7.5" x 2.9" for $17.95 plus shipping.   I got a quick quote from Protocase for three 3" x 11" x 11" U-type 20-gauge steel cases with 10 cutouts with black powder coat, no labels. The total was $616.99, which equates to around $200 each.   As I mentioned earlier, using my approach, a 3" x 5" x 7" deep cabinet would cost around $50. I estimate that a 10" x 10" x 3" cabinet would cost no more than $75.   So, here's the question The basic question I have is: Would cabinets made with my custom extrusions be good enough and worth the cost for most prototype electronics builders? Also, would they be willing to wait one, two, or three weeks to take delivery of such a cabinet?   I am currently working on determining the cost of graining and anodizing the aluminum in batches to see how much this will add to the price. I am also trying to find a service that uses inkjet printers for creating text annotations and graphics on the cabinets. I know that this technique is currently being used by some PCB houses for their silkscreen legends, and I think this would enable an incredible flexibility in labeling, perhaps even coloring the entire cabinet.   Max here again, so there you have it. I think Charles has something here. I know that many of my own hobby projects would benefit from having a more professional-looking cabinet. And if you are a company creating a real-world prototype, having a professional-looking cabinet can be really important when it comes to presenting things to potential customers.   So, what do you think? Is this idea worth pursuing further? Should Charles go it alone, or would a Kickstarter project offer a good option? Please tell us what you think by posting comments below.