投入去研发和工程，就是给车子一份安全。区别还是很大的，真的。
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1076551_huge-2012-chevy-volt-crash-proves-its-safety-credentials
http://www.torquenews.com/1075/severe-chevy-volt-crash-screams-question-volt-really-incendiary
A horrible accident last week in Geneseo NY destroyed a Chevy Volt. Because that Volt did not burst into flames, the event calls into question the whole politicized drama of recent months in which right wing Republican politicians tried to label the Volt as an incendiary fire risk. If the Volt is so incendiary, then where's the fire?
According to a report in the Livingston County News, the crash occurred on May 23, and involved a motorist, driving a Toyota Camry, who failed to stop at an intersection. Instead the Camry went through the intersection, hopped over a ditch, plowed across a lawn, struck two cars sitting side-by-side in a driveway, pushing the cars back 25 feet, and causing damage to the house. The car taking the brunt of the damage, a brand new Chevy Volt, was destroyed beyond recognition, in part because the Camry landed on top of the Volt. The 1998 Grand Cherokee Jeep sitting next to the Volt was also damaged enough to be declared a total loss. The collision caused a fire in the Camry's engine, quickly put out by neighbors, and sent the Camry's driver to the hospital with severe injuries.
/2 
用户1277994 2012-7-10 11:46
用户1657790 2012-7-10 11:09
电池讨厌之处在于，谁也给不出电池在滥用条件下起火的几率。不知道汽车行业对于此类缺陷的允许的几率是多少？百分之一，千分之一。。。。。
本以为VOLT采用20Ah单体电池，然后每个电池由散热部分隔离，可以较好的解决电池热失控的问题。结果还是不理想
用户1406868 2012-6-27 15:34
用户1602177 2012-6-25 15:51