上一篇:《汽车电子可靠性-背景》
因此,可以想见,整个设计往前端倾注了更多的精力。在文档中,有相当多的篇幅是论证这种分析过程,当然方法工具可能是已经普遍存在的,这里更多的是叙述其意义和作用,将他们能够联系起来。大家可着重仔细阅读以下内容(出自上述附件中的介绍文档)。
4 Defi nition and Description of Robustness Validation
4.1 Defi nition of Robustness Validation
4.2 Robustness Validation Process
5 Information and Communication Flow
5.1 Product Requirements
5.2 Use of Available Knowledge
6 Mission Profi le
6.1 Process to Derive a Mission Profile
6.2 Agree Mission Profi le for EEM (System level with Module level)
6.3 Analyze Failure Modes for Reliability of EEM
6.4 Translate to Components Life Time Requirements
6.5 Agree on Mission Profi le for Components (Module Level with Component Level)
6.6 Analyze Failure Modes for Reliability of Component
6.7 Verify Mission Profi le at Component Level in EEM (Module level to Component level)
6.8 Verify Mission Profi le at EEM level in Vehicle (Module level and System Level)
6.9 Verify Mission Profi le at System Level
6.10 Stress Factors and Loads for EEMs / Mechatronics
6.11 Vehicle Service Life
6.12 Environmental Loads in Vehicle
6.13 Functional Loads in Vehicle
6.14 Examples for Mission Profi les / Loads
7 Knowledge Matrix for Systemic Failures
7.1 Knowledge Matrix Defi nition
7.2 Knowledge Matrix Structure
7.3 Knowledge Matrix Use
7.4 Knowledge Matrix Change Control
7.5 Lessons Learned
7.6 Knowledge Matrix Availability
8 Analysis, Modeling and Simulation (AMS)
8.1 Introduction to the Use of Analysis, Modeling and Simulation
8.2 Integration of Design Analysis into the Product Development Process
8.3 Circuit and Systems Analysis
8.4 Categories of E/E Circuits and Systems Modeling and Simulations
8.5 EMC & Signal Integrity (SI) Analysis
8.6 Physical Stress Analysis
8.7 Durability & Reliability Analysis
8.8 Physical Analysis Methods
用户1611378 2012-6-26 15:45
用户1277994 2012-2-16 09:00