It’s well known that the performance and life of the traditional incandescent bulb performance are very sensitive and highly nonlinear in response to the nominal value of the AC line. Years of data on countless bulbs, plus some analytical work, has shown that for a supply voltage V near the rated voltage of the lamp:
-Light output is approximately proportional to V3.4
- Power consumption is approximately proportional to V1.6
- Lifetime is approximately proportional to V-16
- Color temperature is approximately proportional to V0.42
Talk about parametric sensitivity: those are fairly significant exponential-driven variations around a nominal operating voltage setpoint (the Wikipedia entry has many reputable citations and links on this).
I’m sensitive to this problem because I have a small Datel (now Murata/Datel) AC-line voltage meter always in place on one of my outlets (Figure 1). It’s handy because it’s small, unobtrusive, and has no settings or controls; it does only thing, and that is to read out the AC voltage. Mine line is usually at 123 to 135 VAC, thought I have seen it run as high as 128 to 129 VAC, and as low as 118 to 119 VAC, and both extremes are bad, for many reasons. In both the high and low cases, my local electric company blamed it on a problem with my AC line’s neutral connection at the meter box, not their source. (I rejected that rationalization but still paid for inspection by an electrician, who verified the integrity of my power feeds.)
Still, the low and high-line scenarios made me think about the effect of line voltage on compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) and light-emitting diode lamps (LEDs), Figure 2. In contrast to the incandescent lamp, these light sources do not run directly from the AC line, of course, as there is an intermediate AC/DC driver for each of them. I’ve seen many of the reference designs from reputable vendors of the ICs which are at the core of these lamp drivers, and most specify a fairly wide AC-input range over which the driver design will maintain tight output regulation, typically to about 1%.
But wait: isn’t 1% roughly the same variation that the incandescent bulb sees when the AC line is well-managed? That brings me to the core question: what is the performance and lifetime sensitivity of both CFL and LED bulbs themselves (the bulb is the actual illuminating source) to variations in their DC drive? I haven’t been able to find any solid data on this, and I doubt that any would be meaningful anyway. The reason is that it is so dependent on the specific manufacturer of the bulbs, which varies from lamp vendor to vendor and may even vary with a single vendor's between production runs.
There's another thing which bothers me about ratings for CFL: and LEDs. Since their performance is heavily dependent on the performance of the driver, consistency in the manufacture of that driver is critical. Yet we all have read credible stories of substandard and even counterfeit parts being used (knowingly or not) in circuits of this type. The overall unit may appear to even function to spec, at least for a while, but its tolerance for input-voltage variations and temperature-induced changes may be much less than the first-run batches which used quality parts, were fully tested, and then submitted for certification.
Do you have any insight into the performance of mass-market CFL and LED divers with respect to input-line variations or driver output? Have you had any experience with batch and unit variations among what should have been identical units from a given vendor?
用户1406868 2015-10-23 13:41
用户3711875 2015-9-11 00:42
The problem you are discussing here is most common with this type of devices. I want to ask if these are not directly AC operated? Then it is easy to use them. Although you are asking about the drivers then please specify your ratings clearly. You will find number of available drivers according to your specifications.