Twenty-five of Silego's GPAK4 mixed-signal FPGA development kits are currently winging their way to the folks who teased and tempted me the most with their imaginative project proposals.
One of these guys was Harjit Singh, who hails from the state of Washington. In his email to me, Harjit managed to press two of my hot buttons at the same time -- space and robots.
More specifically, in Harjit's message he said: "I'd like to be considered for a GPAK4 development kit because I want to see if I can use it to create a robust watchdog system for use in space. Also, I build robots and I would like to see if I can use a GPAK4 for sensor conditioning."
Now, when someone says "robot," I have to admit that my knee-jerk reaction is of a full-size humanoid creation like Ada in my Alex + Ada column. In this case, however, Harjit was actually referring to a micro-mouse incarnation as illustrated in this video (also, you can click here to see a bunch of videos staring Harjit as himself along with his performing mice).
Did you see how fast the mouse was? If that scampered across the floor in front of me when I wasn't expecting it, I think you'd hear me squealing like a schoolgirl while leaping onto the nearest table. These micro-mice are really rather impressive, especially when you compare them to this demonstration by Claude Shannon in the 1950s. My initial reaction when I first saw this was: "Good grief, how on earth could they make robot mice this small in the 1950s?"
It only took me a few seconds to realize what they must have done -- or at least, to decide the way in which I would have achieved this using the technology of the time -- and I was right. As you'll see if you watch the video, the "brain" of the mouse is a honking big relay computer that's hidden out of sight, while its "muscles" (motive force) are actually located in the table.
Returning to today's micro-mice, Harjit informs me that mouse competitions take place across the US, and that the next big one will occur in March at APEC 2016.
All of this has set my mind buzzing. First, I wonder what Claude Shannon's reaction would have been if I were to hop into my trusty time machine and take one of Harjit's micro-mice back to the 1950s. Second, I want to build my own micro-mouse. I'm hoping to persuade Harjit and his fellow Mouseketeers (I'm sorry, I couldn’t help myself) to write a column telling us more about the physical specifications for the mice and the goals of the competition. Until then, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to watch some more mouse videos (and it's not often you'll hear me say that).
用户1406868 2015-10-23 14:25
用户1602177 2013-5-21 18:15
用户1406868 2013-5-21 11:54
用户1602177 2013-5-21 11:10
下面是来自我们演讲嘉宾Bruce的回复,希望对@彼岸1234 有帮助~~
有些问题确实不是一两句话说的清楚的:
1,针对PI仿真,采用的是什么软件,如何进行的仿真?
业内能实现PI分析的软件主要有SIWAVE和POWER SI,如何进行仿真是软件的操作使用问 题了,可以咨询软件公式进行培训
2, 视频中提到的快速傅里叶变换来分析电流频谱,是如何做的?
最好的方法是取得CPM模型进行分析,如果没有CPM模型的话,自己搭电路进行仿真(这 个是可以单独做一个话题来讲的)
3, 实际电路中该如何去改善,如何着手分析!
这些在现场讨论的时候都有提及 (因此,可以再认真听一下第二部分的视频)
Bruce表示,研讨会或者交流,主要是一个思路与方法的探讨,具体的实现,那是培训的 范畴,有兴趣可以联系相关培训机构,同时,他表示他们也可以提供培训
用户1602177 2013-5-13 15:58
用户1602177 2013-5-13 09:41
很感谢您的回复以及建议~~活动实际上是分为几个部分的,首先安排了理论上的讲座,也是为了大家能够有一个交流的基础,后面就有开放式的交流,基于前面的演讲却又不仅仅限于演讲,对于实际项目中遇到的相关问题,也能够在现场与众工程师们讨论分析~~
用户1541303 2013-5-12 22:39
用户1504149 2013-5-11 16:49
用户1616168 2013-5-11 13:05
用户1616168 2013-5-11 12:59
都是虚的啊,实际内容太少